Updated webrev at

   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6722928/webrev.08/

@build-dev guys, I realize I've never included you in this code review. Please 
take a look.

@Valerie, All comments accepted except for one (see below). In fact, I think I 
found a bug in gss_release_context that it might release a cred handle passed 
in, so I add a isLocalCred flag. However, I test it on my local Windows and it 
seems the same handle can be FreeCredentialsHandle and then used and then freed 
again.

> On Jun 7, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Valerie Peng <valerie.p...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Max,
> 
> <gssapi.h>
> 
> - line 424: the "(used to be const)" comment can now be removed.
> 
> <sspi.cpp>
> 
> - line 396-403: on line 338, there is no need to go to err as no memory has 
> been allocated. What happens when jumping to err but the variables, i.e. 
> value and name, have not been declared? Line 400-401 seems not used as there 
> is no more goto err after line 391.
> 
> - line 528: the size of buffer here is 4*len + 1, but then when calling 
> WideCharToMultiByte, the 6th argument is len. Seems inconsistent? line 534: 
> shouldn't we free "buffer" here?
> 
> - line 596: free cred allocated on line 588? line 610 and 617: free cred and 
> cred->phCredK? line 638 and 644, 648 and 653: free cred, cred->phCredK and 
> cred->phCredS?
> 
> - line 829: free the context handle allocated on line 807? line 879: free 
> newCred? line 901: no memory de-allocation before returning error? line 921: 
> seems redundant given line 918.
> 
> - line 1071: based on gss api doc, context_handle should be set to 
> GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT after deletion.
> 
> - line 1333: what about secBuff[1].pvBuffer?

According to the DecryptMessage spec, "The encrypted message is decrypted in 
place, overwriting the original contents of its buffer". I've printed out both 
secBuff[0].pvBuffer and secBuff[1].pvBuffer after the decryption and the latter 
is indeed inside the former.

> 
> - line 1390, 1393, 1397: call gss_release_oid_set before returning failure?
> 
> - line 1471: should we return an error code here when FormatMessage() call 
> failed?
> 
> Rest looks fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Valerie

Thanks,
Max

[1] 
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/sspi/nf-sspi-decryptmessage

> 
> On 6/4/2019 2:52 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> I uploaded an updated webrev in place. The only changes are:
>> 
>> 1. s/SSPI_TRACE/SSPI_BRIDGE_TRACE/ in sspi.cpp
>> 2. Several copyright year updates.
>> 3. Remove one unused import.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Max
>> 
>>> On May 30, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Here is the latest webrev
>>> 
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6722928/webrev.07/

Reply via email to