I understand the desire to change this, but are we sure the doc should be changed instead of the property? I would tend to believe users code to the doc and don’t notice it wasn’t working. Not reading the source code and code to that implemented name. Otherwise I’d assume someone would have filed a bug already in the 2yrs.
I don’t want us to support two properties, I’m just not confident which way is right. Tony > On Nov 5, 2019, at 4:00 PM, Xuelei Fan <xuelei....@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > May I have the CSR reviewed? > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233652 > > The system property, "jsse.enableMFLNExtension", was introduced in JDK 9 (See > JSSE Reference Guides). However, the implementation code uses > "jsse.enableMFLExtension" (without 'N') instead. > > As the system property may have been used in practice, it may be better to > change the CSR and doc accordingly. > > Thanks, > Xuelei
