On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:30:22 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> verbose warning message test and renaming in System.java > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/System.java line 381: > >> 379: if (allowSecurityManager()) { >> 380: var caller = Reflection.getCallerClass(); >> 381: String signature = caller.getName() + " (" + >> codeSource(caller) + ")"; > > Hello Weijun, > > Given that the `codeSource()` method above is allowed to return `null`, there > could be a case where the warning message printed would be something like: > >> >> WARNING: A terminally deprecated method in java.lang.System has been called >> WARNING: System::setSecurityManager has been called by foo.bar.Hello (null) >> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of foo.bar.Hello >> WARNING: System::setSecurityManager will be removed in a future release >> > > Would that be OK or do you think the presence of "(null)" be unnecessary and > confusing? Maybe in such cases that line should just say > "System::setSecurityManager has been called by foo.bar.Hello"? > > Another minor nit - the variable is named `signature` which initially gave me > an impression that it was the method signature of the caller code, but that > isn't the case. Should this variable be renamed perhaps? Good catches. Will fix it. Thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/13