On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:30:22 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   verbose warning message test and renaming in System.java
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/System.java line 381:
> 
>> 379:         if (allowSecurityManager()) {
>> 380:             var caller = Reflection.getCallerClass();
>> 381:             String signature = caller.getName() + " (" + 
>> codeSource(caller) + ")";
> 
> Hello Weijun,
> 
> Given that the `codeSource()` method above is allowed to return `null`, there 
> could be a case where the warning message printed would be something like:
> 
>> 
>> WARNING: A terminally deprecated method in java.lang.System has been called
>> WARNING: System::setSecurityManager has been called by foo.bar.Hello (null)
>> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of foo.bar.Hello
>> WARNING: System::setSecurityManager will be removed in a future release
>> 
> 
> Would that be OK or do you think the presence of "(null)" be unnecessary and 
> confusing? Maybe in such cases that line should just say 
> "System::setSecurityManager has been called by foo.bar.Hello"?
> 
> Another minor nit - the variable is named `signature` which initially gave me 
> an impression that it was the method signature of the caller code, but that 
> isn't the case. Should this variable be renamed perhaps?

Good catches. Will fix it. Thanks.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/13

Reply via email to