On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:32:24 GMT, Andrey Turbanov <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> It is observed that when running crypto benchmark with large number of
>> threads, a lot of time is spent on the synchronized block inside the
>> Provider.getService() method. The cause for this is that
>> Provider.getService() method first uses the 'serviceMap' field to find the
>> requested service. However, when the requested service is not supported by
>> this provider, e.g. requesting Cipher.RSA from SUN provider, the impl
>> continues to try searching the legacy registrations whose processing is
>> guarded by the "synchronized" keyword. When apps use getInstance() calls
>> without the provider argument, Provider class has to iterate through
>> existing providers trying to find one that supports the requested service.
>>
>> Now that the parent class of Provider no longer synchronizes all of its
>> methods, Provider class should follow suit and de-synchronize its methods.
>> Parsing of the legacy registration is done eagerly (at the time of put(...)
>> calls) instead of lazily (at the time of getService(...) calls). This also
>> makes "legacyStrings" redundant as the registration is parsed and stored
>> directly into "legacyMap".
>>
>> The bug reporter has confirmed that the changes resolve the performance
>> bottleneck and all regression tests pass.
>>
>> Please review and thanks in advance,
>> Valerie
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Provider.java line 930:
>
>> 928: boolean result = super.remove(key, value);
>> 929: if (result && key instanceof String && value instanceof String)
>> {
>> 930: parseLegacy((String)key, (String)value, OPType.REMOVE);
>
> I suggest to use pattern matching for instanceof to avoid manual casts
Sure, will do so. Thanks for the suggestion.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6513
