On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:17:34 GMT, Valerie Peng <valer...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> It is observed that when running crypto benchmark with large number of 
>> threads, a lot of time is spent on the synchronized block inside the 
>> Provider.getService() method. The cause for this is that 
>> Provider.getService() method first uses the 'serviceMap' field to find the 
>> requested service. However, when the requested service is not supported by 
>> this provider, e.g. requesting Cipher.RSA from SUN provider, the impl 
>> continues to try searching the legacy registrations whose processing is 
>> guarded by the "synchronized" keyword. When apps use getInstance() calls 
>> without the provider argument, Provider class has to iterate through 
>> existing providers trying to find one that supports the requested service.
>> 
>> Now that the parent class of Provider no longer synchronizes all of its 
>> methods, Provider class should follow suit and de-synchronize its methods. 
>> Parsing of the legacy registration is done eagerly (at the time of put(...) 
>> calls) instead of lazily (at the time of getService(...) calls). This also 
>> makes "legacyStrings" redundant as the registration is parsed and stored 
>> directly into "legacyMap". 
>> 
>> The bug reporter has confirmed that the changes resolve the performance 
>> bottleneck and all regression tests pass.
>> 
>> Please review and thanks in advance,
>> Valerie
>
> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Updated to use pattern matching with instanceof operator.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Provider.java line 1324:

> 1322:     public Set<Service> getServices() {
> 1323:         checkInitialized();
> 1324:         if (serviceSet == null || legacyChanged || servicesChanged) {

`serviceSet` should be at least made `volatile`

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6513

Reply via email to