security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8382269: keytool man page references to "JKS" need to be cleaned up Daisuke Yamazaki
• RFR: 8377980: Add methods returning Instant instead of Date to X509CRL and X509CRLEntry Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377980: Add methods returning Instant instead of Date to X509CRL and X509CRLEntry [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377980: Add methods returning Instant instead of Date to X509CRL and X509CRLEntry [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377980: Add methods returning Instant instead of Date to X509CRL and X509CRLEntry [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
• Integrated: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v2] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v3] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v4] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v4] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v4] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v5] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v5] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v5] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v6] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v7] Andreas Chmielewski
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v7] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8387124: Incomplete algorithm decomposition for TLS 1.3 cipher suites in SSLAlgorithmDecomposer [v7] Andreas Chmielewski
• Integrated: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v5] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v6] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v6] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 [v6] Shawn Emery
  • Integrated: 8386911: Crypto benchmark regressions after JDK-8384353 Volodymyr Paprotski
• RFR: 8387123: Remove LuxTrust Global Root CA Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8387123: Remove LuxTrust Global Root CA Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8387123: Remove LuxTrust Global Root CA Rajan Halade
  • Integrated: 8387123: Remove LuxTrust Global Root CA Mark Powers
• Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v4] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v4] duke
• Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
• [jdk27] RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Artur Barashev
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
• [jdk27] RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Naoto Sato
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Sean Mullan
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException duke
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Sean Mullan
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset duke
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Hai-May Chao
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Anthony Scarpino
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Artur Barashev
  • Integrated: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
• Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v3] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v4] Anthony Scarpino
  • Integrated: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8376599: Update Cipher/PBE/PBEKeyTest.java for non-ASCII characters Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8376599: Update Cipher/PBE/PBEKeyTest.java for non-ASCII characters Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8376599: Update Cipher/PBE/PBEKeyTest.java for non-ASCII characters Rajan Halade
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Sean Mullan
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException duke
  • Integrated: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset duke
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v4] Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
• [jdk27] RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Sean Mullan
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v3] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v3] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v4] Sean Mullan

• Earlier messages