On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:17:00 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> So you think the name is misleading? Yes. > But then if you want to talk about one you have to say which class it is in, > and this could be confusing and sometimes wrong. I did not get the idea yet to define it in KEPSpi. It looks like that only one interface in the KEM should be sufficient. The interface implementation details could be provider based. It is OK to have an provider implementation implements an interface internally. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13256#discussion_r1164743148
