On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:53:23 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/security/Security/ConfigFileTestAnonymousPipes.sh line 1: >> >>> 1: # >> >> This test failed on linux-x64 and linux-aarch64 on our test systems. Here's >> a snippet of the logfile: >> >> >> properties[0x3|main|Security.java:160|2025-12-02 13:35:48.066]: unable to >> load security properties from <(echo include /dev/stdin) >> java.io.FileNotFoundException: <(echo include /dev/stdin) >> at >> java.base/java.security.Security$SecPropLoader.loadExtraFromPath(Security.java:209) >> at >> java.base/java.security.Security$SecPropLoader.loadExtraHelper(Security.java:178) >> at >> java.base/java.security.Security$SecPropLoader.loadExtra(Security.java:157) >> at >> java.base/java.security.Security$SecPropLoader.loadAll(Security.java:122) >> at java.base/java.security.Security.initialize(Security.java:337) >> at java.base/java.security.Security.<clinit>(Security.java:326) >> at java.base/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.ensureClassInitialized0(Native >> Method) >> at >> java.base/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.ensureClassInitialized(Unsafe.java:1195) >> at >> java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup.ensureInitialized(MethodHandles.java:2750) >> at >> java.base/jdk.internal.access.SharedSecrets.ensureClassInitialized(SharedSecrets.java:504) >> at >> java.base/jdk.internal.access.SharedSecrets.getJavaSecurityPropertiesAccess(SharedSecrets.java:320) >> at >> java.base/sun.launcher.SecuritySettings.printSecurityProperties(SecuritySettings.java:88) >> at >> java.base/sun.launcher.SecuritySettings.printSecuritySettings(SecuritySettings.java:63) >> at >> java.base/sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.showSettings(LauncherHelper.java:172) > > Looks like `<(echo include /dev/stdin)` is being interpreted literally, > instead of defining a [Bash Process > Substitution](https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Process-Substitution.html). > > Thinking Bash would be the execution shell on all the platforms was probably > a wrong assumption. Let me see if I can replace it by something else, > otherwise I will need to give up and remove that second one. > > The first one must be passing, otherwise it would have exited without getting > to the second one: > > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/4e7206c082e4b0152d999b32eba0063a506eff67/test/jdk/java/security/Security/ConfigFileTestAnonymousPipes.sh#L54 I managed to convert it to a Java test: 51a3ce86649e2e44048ae6028aea1edf0a72812d. I would greatly appreciate if someone can run the new version in the same testing environment. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24465#discussion_r2583355106
