On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:07:07 GMT, Matthias Baesken <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Looks like to get into the else case starting at line 284 or before the >> patch like 282 , ipv6_available() / ipv6av can be false ; or also the >> second part of the if check can be false >> >> !(family == java_net_InetAddress_IPv4 && v4MappedAddress == JNI_FALSE)) >> >> so we should distinguish the 2 cases. Not sure if this really happens, on >> our system showing the error we got the other one `Caused by: >> java.net.SocketException: Protocol family ipv6, ipv6 on machine unavailable` > > Or just write the old message `"Protocol family unavailable" ` for this case > and enhance the else case ? Looking more at the checks, I think we can always use the exception `JNU_ThrowByName(env, JNU_JAVANETPKG "SocketException", "Protocol family ipv6, ipv6 on machine unavailable");` without the if and else. At least as long as the other if checks do not change. Do you agree? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28825#discussion_r2619948700
