On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:03:21 GMT, ExE Boss <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> Making it package private to `java.security` would avoid IDEs suggesting to 
>>> add `InternalBinaryEncodable` to `switch` statements in `java.base` 
>>> (outside of `java.security`).
>> 
>> That sounds like an IDE issue in that IDEs shouldn't be suggesting to add 
>> references to non-accessible classes.
>
> Yeah, but when editing `java.base` (to contribute to **OpenJDK**), the class 
> is accessible (to `java.base`).

This is still a preview, if this is truly an issue, it can be moved by Final.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31391#discussion_r3390278047

Reply via email to