Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Why would you need to hand edit it ?
> Because initially squid was logging the ip address of the proxy.

oh, yes I simply added the patches and fixed the actual DansGuardian
configuration but I will update the cinfiguration templates aswell ..

 
> >What did you change by hand ?
> >
> forwardedfor and xforwardedfor, both to on.

ok, I will add these ... and eventually some more stuff, if I will find
some time ... I'm working on static routes and pptp testing (dhcp over
ipsec, pptp radius authentication, ppp dynamic ip allocation through dhcp,
etc)
 
> >I'll check that ... I never use that ... I simply open the 8443 port on
> >the interface I want ... and that's it my admin interface :o)
> >
> If it has no real meaning, ie the really important item is just the port,
> the perhaps the admin interface nomenclature should be removed.

yes, I might do that or update the admin stuff ... but it's rather
obsolete IMHO

 
> >oh ? it starts fine here .. chkconfig --list httpd2-naat ?
> >
> >
> Yea I had to add it whth check config.

it worked for me on freshly installed system ... 

> REDIRECT        lan:192.168.200.64/29   fw:8080    tcp     www     -
> all
> 
> (shorewall fails on this)

this is hopefuly fixed already. You can now choose "-" in zone and add the
8080 (edit the REDIRECT rule updated by the squid proxy and you'll have a
better picture how to create such a rule; it's quite easy) as a port value. 
 
> >
> >>The problem is that I can't do the 8080 in the GUI without adding fw: to
> >>it.  When I do it like that shorewall fails to restart. -randy

now you can do it ...


> sarg isn't running right....  It's getting a segmentation violation...

really ? I'll check again ... 
 
> Any word on the time restriction on ports ? 

yes, the time restriction is almost there ... and this because I have
added the netfilter time patch on the kernel already (the one
kernel+iptables on my website has it already) so I'll update the web
interface today or tomorrow ... 

> Another thing that would be
> really nice is the ability to serve internal dns information for the local
> network.

I'm sort of against this because it's a firewall after all .... but I'll
note it on my TODO list ... if I have time I'll add it

cheers,
-- 
Florin Grad                     http://www.mandrakesoft.com
                                http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~florin/

____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________

Reply via email to