"Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There's something truly ironic about someone lobbying for an entirely
> new and unanalyzed cryptographic protocol suggesting that using the
> most widely implemented crypto protocol in the world would be
> reinventing the wheel.

There would be several changes needed as already stated on this
list. And new XEPs would need to be created. XEPs for stuff for which
already XEPs exist. If that's not reinventing, I don't know.

-- 
Jonathan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to