Yes, but just throwing resources at something doesn't make it efficient.
As for code cache/accelerator, I agree - improvement is quite big because MW
is doing lots of includes plus MW can use it for cache as well - I use APC
and it works pretty good.
Sergey
On Dec 28, 2007 6:36 AM, cnit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Forget my previous post. The problem goesaway when I removed one
> > template. It seems the performance issue is related tothe
> > application instead of the database.
> Try setting up eAccelerator for PHP, maybe it would help a bit. Also,
> I believe that MW/SMW requires dedicated server (co-location). We've
> tried usual low-cost hosting (with hundreds of other's virtual hosts)
> and even MW alone was crawling..
> Also, it was slow under Windows. It's ok with Linux server. Of course
> you could also try dedicated MySQL server. MW even supports MySQL
> clustering and web load-balancing, because it's being used by
> wikipedia - one of the busiest and largest sites in the world.
> Dmitriy
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
