On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Jeff Thompson wrote: > What are the plans for exporting compound value types to RDF? > You may be getting into "blank nodes".
We currently export them with an auxilliary node that is indeed blank. We could, however, also give it some arbitrary name without loosing the intended semantics (in fact, that is what many OWL DL tools will silently do to treat the blank node, it is called "skolemisation"). -- Markus > > Markus Krötzsch wrote: > > One could also call them "many-valued properties". "Composite" > > and "structured" are also an improvement. "Composite type" or "compound > > type" would both be fine. Any such name can of course be misunderstood, > > but at least (in contrast to nary) it can be understood at all ;-) -- Markus Krötzsch Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe phone +49 (0)721 608 7362 fax +49 (0)721 608 5998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www http://korrekt.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
