Hi Yury, Hi Laurent, Thanks for your answers. The thing is, I actually do not want to import a whole vocabulary just for "reusing" the URI foaf:knows. I would prefer to simply declare a property page in a wiki to have the same URI as some other. Whether foaf:knows is used directly (which would not require a reasoner afterwards to make use of the data), is linked using owl:sameAs (which is mostly done in Linked Data), or is linked using owl:equivalentProperty (which would semantically be the right thing) is not so relevant; but would it not make sense if equivalent URI for properties worked just like for regular pages (and maybe also for categories)?
Best, Benedikt -- AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Phone: +49 721 608-47946 Email: benedikt.kaemp...@kit.edu Web: http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Hauptseite/en > -----Original Message----- > From: ganqtur...@gmail.com [mailto:ganqtur...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Yury Katkov > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 8:19 AM > To: Benedikt Kämpgen > Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Equivalent URI > > Oh, I forgot to add a link to my experiment: > http://scratchpad.referata.com/wiki/Special:ExportRDF/Property:Mypropert > y > > Sincerely yours, > > Yury V. Katkov > WikiVote! llc > > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Yury Katkov <katkov.ju...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Benedikt! > > I think it should be considered as owl:sameAs and that's all according > to documentation. If you want foaf:knows property to be inferred - you > need an inference engine or just use Import vocabulary feature. > > However when I tried to make equivalent property at Referata I > found that there is no owl:sameAs, but owl:equivalentProperty. That's > weird, is that a mistake in a documentation? > > Sincerely yours, > > Yury V. Katkov > WikiVote! llc > > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Benedikt Kämpgen > <benedikt.kaemp...@kit.edu> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I was wondering, if I declare a property page > "Property:Knows" in SMW > [[equivalent URI:: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows] > <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows%5D> ], why is this not > considered in the RDF export? An equivalent relationship > between both would > be nice. A direct usage of foaf:knows in the export would > even be better. > > Regards, > > Benedikt > > -- > AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) > Phone: +49 721 608-47946 > Email: benedikt.kaemp...@kit.edu > Web: http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Hauptseite/en > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application > performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes > this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > Semediawiki-devel mailing list > Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
