It was in the "Sepsis Redefined" talk Monday at 3:00pm.
Brenda

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Michael Ries 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I did not see where the new definition was presented today?


Michael Ries, MD, MBA, FCCM, FCCP, FACP
Medical Director, Adult Critical Care and eICU
Advocate Health Care
1400 Kensington Road
Oak Brook, IL  60523
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
(o): 630-575-8364 or  773-935-5556  (M): 312-613-0031
Fax: 312-573-1837   Pager: 312-249-0402

<image001.jpg>
             http://www.advocatehealth.com<http://www.advocatehealth.com/>

Inspiring medicine.  Changing lives.



This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail 
(or the person responsible for delivering this document to the intended 
recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, 
printing or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please respond to the 
individual sending the message and permanently delete the original and any copy 
of any e-mail and any printout thereof.



From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mitchell Levy
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 2:27 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] SIRS/Sepsis Criteria and Coding

By the current definition, sepsis is defined at 2/4 SIRS + documented or 
suspected infection.  So yes, even mild bronchitis by that definition is 
“sepsis.”   Most clinicians use “sepsis” as synomous with Severe Sepsis, which 
includes organ dysfunction.

Having said that, there is  a task force that has been re-visiting the 
definitions of sepsis.    We have been meeting for the past year, and the 
results will be presented today at SCCM meeting in Phoenix.  Stay tuned…..


Mitchell

From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 12:16 PM
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] SIRS/Sepsis Criteria and Coding

This is what I am been predicting!

  I have spoke directly with Dr Levy on several occasions and he maintains if 
you have  TWO  sustained abnormalities of the SIRS criteria and not due to a 
non- inflammatory condition then he and the literature states that is sepsis... 
and this should stand with external reviewers.

However, as a clinician I have trouble with this  and I am sure I have a lot of 
patients with acute infective bronchitis who meet the criteria  for sepsis in 
my office that I send home on antibiotics...Hardly are they septic!

  So at least make sure that the SIRS criteria are sustained till treatment is 
begun and not just a triage VS done in the ER. I also (unlike Dr Levy's advice) 
don't count an increased heart rate or RR in patients who are hypoxic, as in 
pneumonia.
 Good luck!



William E. Haik, M.D., F.C.C.P., C.D.I.P.
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Office: (850) 863-2110<tel:(850)%20863-2110>
Cell: (850) 803-5854<tel:(850)%20803-5854>
Fax: (850) 864-4438 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>

<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
In a message dated 1/17/2015 9:45:57 A.M. Central Standard Time, [email protected] 
writes:<tel:(850)%20864-4438>

<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
I am writing to inquire how other institutions are handling or if you are even 
encountering concerns, that we are “over-calling”  early sepsis, especially 
when the only SIRS criteria are tachycardia and tachypnea (sometimes only a 
single set of VS). We are reviewing all short stay (Observation, 1-2 day stays) 
and see “septic” patients who are “in no acute distress”, are only here in 
Observation status and never Inpatient, or stay as IP only 1-2 days, are not 
sent home on any antibiotics or only a short course of oral 
antibiotics.<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Often their only SIRS criteria are tachycardia and tachypnea—which are quite 
non-specific markers that can be seen with anxiety, pain, etc. but when paired 
with a suspected or documented infection role up to 
Sepsis?!<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Since Sepsis is a high-paying condition it’s also a high audit DRG (mainly 
because, in the past, many patients were in ICU, very ill, and expending lots 
of resources). Now that “early sepsis” is being diagnosed quite frequently, 
external auditors are reviewing sepsis DRG charts, and disagree that  sepsis 
was present at all, recode the chart, reassign the DRG and reduce payment to 
UTI, pneumonia, etc.  This is so frustrating as we are trying to educated our 
providers and nurses on the importance of having a high suspicion for sepsis 
and early recognition and now are turning around and saying don’t say ‘Sepsis’ 
unless they are “sick” because we need to be able to defend it!? 
☹<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Any feedback, thoughts, or tools on how other institutions are handling this, 
would be greatly appreciated especially when it comes to the SIRS criteria 
which most of our clinicians call “soft criteria”?<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Thank you in advance for your time and expertise!<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Claudia<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Claudia Orth BSN, RN, CCRN-K<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Regional Sepsis Coordinator<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
Munson Medical Center<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
(231) 935-5692 (Voice)<tel:(850)%20864-4438>

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
 <tel:(850)%20864-4438>



_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
<tel:(850)%20864-4438>
_______________________________________________ Sepsisgroups mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to