Sorry for my misinterpretation of your question, Rick. I work in a hospital
where house staff and others often order a peripheral vbg solely for venous
saturation, erroneously using the result to guide resuscitation instead of
obtaining central or mixed venous saturation.

There's a useful summary of the relative values of VBGs vs ABGs in UptoDate
- "Venous blood gases and other alternatives to arterial blood gases" -
with a caution regarding PvCO2 in shock states. The difference between
PvCO2 and PaCO2 widens with severity of shock and can be substantial. An
elevated PvCO2 may therefore indicate shock, hypercarbia, or some
combination thereof. Mixed forms and subtle degrees of shock can be
difficult to recognize at the bedside.

The authors also caution: "Importantly, sufficient variability between
arterial and venous blood gas values may exist such that periodic
correlation between arterial and venous blood gas values is always prudent."

Peripheral venous O2 saturation cannot replace central or mixed venous
saturation as a guide to resuscitation.

On one hand, rapid peripheral VBG analysis may spare a patient an arterial
puncture to assess pH, pCO2, and HCO3; on the other hand, interpretation of
that peripheral VBG may be more complicated than realized. I'm unaware of
studies addressing the relative accuracies of interpretation, effects on
outcome, value as an addition to screening panels, or prognostic
implications of peripheral VBGs in particular.

Arguably, neither ABGs nor VBGs are necessary to manage many patients with
sepsis.

Look forward to seeing other opinions.

Thanks Ron



On Nov 30, 2015 9:14 PM, "Rutherford, Richard" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Doctor Elkin,
>
>
> Thanks for your response.  The advocates of VBG at my hospital are not
proposing to use peripheral blood to follow SVO2 but rather to have access
to peripheral venous pH, HCO3, pCO2 and electrolytes in five minutes
instead of an hour.  They feel it could lead to earlier recognition of
critical illness especially in mixed situations (hypercarbia respiratory
failure AND septic shock for example). At our hospital it would not add
cost or resource time, and it makes some intuitive sense to me but I am
unaware of any emergency departments using this strategy.  I appreciate
your thoughts.
>
>
> Rick
>
>
> Richard Rutherford, M.D.
> Quality Medical Director, Ventura County Medical Center
> 3291 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003
> (805) 665-8234 (cell)
> (805) 652-6096 (office)
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ron Elkin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 7:10 PM
> To: Rutherford, Richard
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] VBG for screening
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> VBG must be obtained from central access point - junction of RA and SVC
or from pulmonary artery - to permit interpretation. Most patients lack
central access at time they are screened.  VBG from a peripheral vein is of
little or no value.
> Central saturation and CVP before resuscitation (forgive me for this
blasphemy) -  if readily available from a dialysis catheter, PICC or port
-  may help guide the resuscitation effort, or at least make you think
twice about your patient.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ron Elkin MD
> California Pacific Medical Center
> San Francisco
>
> On Nov 30, 2015 2:21 PM, "Rutherford, Richard" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> My hospital is considering expanding our sepsis screening so that a
VBG+Lactate is checked for every patient with a positive sepsis screen
(instead of lactate alone).  Have any other hospitals done this?  Does
anyone have a second set of criteria for sicker patients for whom VBG is
ordered?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Richard Rutherford, M.D.
>> Quality Medical Director, Ventura County Medical Center
>> 3291 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003
>> (805) 665-8234 (cell)
>> (805) 652-6096 (office)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>>
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to