Ok excellent. Thanks!

Amy Gossett Marlett
BSN, RN, CCRN
Sepsis Coordinator
Office: 940.384.3254
Cell: 214.801.2950
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


[cid:[email protected]]     [cid:[email protected]]
Enhancing community health through service
 with compassion, excellence and efficiency.

[icon-facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/dentonregional>       [icon-twitter] 
<http://twitter.com/dentonregional>       [icon-youtube] 
<http://www.youtube.com/dentonregional>       [wordpress-blue copy] 
<http://dentonregional.ballywhointeractive.com/>

This email and any files transmitted with it may contain PRIVILEGED or 
CONFIDENTIAL information and may be read or used only by the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or any of its 
attachments, please be advised that you have received this email in error and 
that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email or any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please immediately purge it and all attachments and notify 
the sender by reply email or contact the sender at the number listed.

From: Townsend, Sean, M.D. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 7:06 PM
To: Marlett Amy <[email protected]>; Clement, Joseph (DPH) 
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: RE: Re: [Sepsis Groups] SEP-1 Specification Manual for 
January 2017 Discharges


Amy, you were correct.  I mean to say "blood culture" acceptable delay and too 
quickly typed "antibiotic" acceptable delay.



To summarize:



To further ensure that blood culture collection does not delay appropriate 
care, the next specification update, Version 5.2, has a new data element 
entitled Blood Culture Collection Acceptable Delay which allows for a case to 
pass the measure if a clinician indicates that "the IV antibiotic was started 
before the blood culture was drawn because waiting for the blood culture to be 
drawn would have resulted in a delay of 45 minutes or more in starting the IV 
antibiotic." SEP-1 Version 5.2 was published July 1st, 2016, and will cover 
discharges from January 1st, 2017 through December 31st, 2017.





Sean R. Townsend, M.D.

Vice President of Quality & Safety

California Pacific Medical Center

2330 Clay Street, #301

San Francisco, CA  94115

email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

office (415) 600-5770

fax (415) 600-1541





-----Original Message-----
From: Marlett Amy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 1:21 PM
To: Townsend, Sean, M.D.; Clement, Joseph (DPH)
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [External] RE: Re: [Sepsis Groups] SEP-1 Specification Manual for 
January 2017 Discharges



I am looking at the following below from Dr. Townsend " As regards antibiotic 
acceptable delay the provider has to state a delay of 45 minutes or longer 
would have transpired."

My question is- was this this answer to J. Clement comment below " I see that a 
new element was added "Blood Culture Collection Acceptable Delay" - but I'm not 
clear from the manual what constitutes an acceptable delay.  Am I missing 
something?  Can anybody clarify?"



If so, I do not understand the reply. I only see a change to the BC part of the 
measure, not Abx. So why I do not understand. If there is another question in 
these emails regarding Abx, then I missed it. Thank you for clarifying and for 
this workgroup. I have never sent in a question before, but I find most of the 
posts very useful and know that eventually someone will ask my questions.



Amy Gossett Marlett

BSN, RN, CCRN

Sepsis Coordinator

Denton Regional Medical Center

Office: 940.384.3254

Cell: 214.801.2950

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>







Enhancing community health through service

 with compassion, excellence and efficiency.







This email and any files transmitted with it may contain PRIVILEGED or 
CONFIDENTIAL information and may be read or used only by the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or any of its 
attachments, please be advised that you have received this email in error and 
that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email or any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please immediately purge it and all attachments and notify 
the sender by reply email or contact the sender at the number listed.



-----Original Message-----

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Townsend, Sean, M.D.

Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 5:53 PM

To: Clement, Joseph (DPH) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sepsis Groups] SEP-1 Specification Manual for January 
2017 Discharges



You are correct in your reading.  The LIP can now attest to the reperfusion 
assessment without giving greater detail.  What is more, nursing documentation 
and a nursing exam can be the basis of that attestation.  The only requirement 
is that the one exam item LIP has to do as part of that attestation is a 
cardiopulmonary exam.



This is huge. I hope you appreciate the change.  Our goal wasn't to make people 
document but rather to conduct an exam and satisfy themselves that the patient 
was perfusing adequately.



As regards antibiotic acceptable delay the provider has to state a delay of 45 
minutes or longer would have transpired.



There are other goodies in version 5.2.







On Aug 24, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Clement, Joseph (DPH) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:





Hello,





I'm reviewing the updated specification manual 5.2 for SEP-1, that will go into 
effect 1/1/17, and I have a few questions - I wonder if others are further 
along than me.



https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.qualitynet.org%2fdcs%2fContentServer%3fc%3dPage%26pagename%3dQnetPublic%252FPage%252FQnetTier3%26cid%3d1228775749207&data=01%7c01%7cTownseSR%40sutterhealth.org%7c6a4cac439bc34d189c5b08d3cd2ceb2c%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=no%2bMj06K1%2fmVYusd%2fdgoPBJMdk02vH6DhCx%2fL2W5fMY%3d<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.qualitynet.org%2fdcs%2fContentServer%3fc%3dPage%26pagename%3dQnetPublic%252FPage%252FQnetTier3%26cid%3d1228775749207&data=01%7c01%7ctownsesr%40sutterhealth.org%7c9dad663bd1fe4129e4c108d3cc602cd1%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=Lfj7WQvlpCs3T%2b0LsrjWZtrnfLyK42X5rtVyK7r924w%3d<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.qualitynet.org%2fdcs%2fContentServer%3fc%3dPage%26pagename%3dQnetPublic%252FPage%252FQnetTier3%26cid%3d1228775749207&data=01%7c01%7cTownseSR%40sutterhealth.org%7c6a4cac439bc34d189c5b08d3cd2ceb2c%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=no%2bMj06K1%2fmVYusd%2fdgoPBJMdk02vH6DhCx%2fL2W5fMY%3d%3chttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.qualitynet.org%2fdcs%2fContentServer%3fc%3dPage%26pagename%3dQnetPublic%252FPage%252FQnetTier3%26cid%3d1228775749207&data=01%7c01%7ctownsesr%40sutterhealth.org%7c9dad663bd1fe4129e4c108d3cc602cd1%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=Lfj7WQvlpCs3T%2b0LsrjWZtrnfLyK42X5rtVyK7r924w%3d>>





[] The manual says that MD attestation of reassessment, VS review, skin 
assessment, cardiopulmonary exam, and peripheral pulse exams are acceptable. It 
also says that "performing, or attesting to performing a physical examination, 
perfusion (re-perfusion) assessment, or sepsis (severe sepsis or septic shock) 
focused exam is acceptable."



At the risk of asking an obvious question, I just want to make sure I am 
getting this right.  If the MD signs something that says "I attest to having 
performed a severe sepsis re-perfusion exam at XX:XX", then this would meet the 
measure requirement?





[] I see that a new element was added "Blood Culture Collection Acceptable 
Delay" - but I'm not clear from the manual what constitutes an acceptable 
delay.  Am I missing something?  Can anybody clarify?





Thanks in advance!





Joe





Joseph Clement, MS, RN, CCNS

Clinical Nurse Specialist

San Francisco General Hospital

ph: 628 206-6174

pg: 415 327-0220

office: H5841

_______________________________________________

Sepsisgroups mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flists.sepsisgroups.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org&data=01%7c01%7ctownsesr%40sutterhealth.org%7c9dad663bd1fe4129e4c108d3cc602cd1%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=BlT2F7r747RhCs%2b9%2bHngzIRsVDD7dev%2bIjCfd%2fn1mSU%3d

_______________________________________________

Sepsisgroups mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flists.sepsisgroups.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org&data=01%7c01%7cTownseSR%40sutterhealth.org%7c6a4cac439bc34d189c5b08d3cd2ceb2c%7caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7c0&sdata=OLA%2b9FqHqtU5BJOVwWs1m094FbGRTg3sdh25Rzny5oM%3d




_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to