In response to the coding questions for septic shock with an initial lactic 
acid > 4:

According to the guidelines from our vendor, for purposes of abstracting, the 
chart is Abstracted, not Coded necessarily, as septic shock.

Lara Houghton, BSN, RN
Quality Improvement- Coordinator
407-518-3874


-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 9:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 233, Issue 2

Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: question (Crowley Amy)
   2. Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [**External**] Antibiotic order date &
      time (Belfi, Karen)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:22:54 +0000
From: Crowley Amy <[email protected]>
To: "Gibbs, Katie" <[email protected]>, Chambless Deborah
        <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] question
Message-ID:
        
<by1pr02mb11459569ea707f91203e9886e9...@by1pr02mb1145.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The coders cannot infer and give a diagnosis that is not in the pt's record. 
What they CAN do and WILL do is query the provider for this diagnosis based on 
the guidelines that they follow. If the provider then gives that diagnosis on 
the query, the pt will get coded as such.

You all probably know this , but - For the Core Measure, if a diagnosis is made 
post dc, which most of these queries are, we are not to abstract theses pt's. 
Same for if the only documentation of severe sepsis or septic shock is in the 
dc summary- we do not abstract.

If you all did not know- coders guidelines are not the same as we follow per 
the SSC and the 3 and 6 hour time frames. These queries can be tricky and 
deceiving and we MUST be diligent in our education, communication and 
assistance to providers about queries. Also, in getting invalid queries 
overturned so that our own facility level data is accurate, as well as 
nationwide data that many decisions about sepsis can be based upon.

Amy Crowley
Sepsis Coordinator
Medical City Denton
3535 South I-35E
Denton, Texas 76210
P: 940-384-3254
C: 214-801-2950
DentonRegional.com

This email and any files transmitted with it may contain PRIVILEGED or 
CONFIDENTIAL information and may be read or used only by the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or any of its 
attachments, please be advised that you have received this email in error and 
that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this email or any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please immediately purge it and all attachments and notify 
the sender by reply email or contact the sender at the number listed.


From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Gibbs, Katie
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Chambless Deborah <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sepsis Groups] question

Correct, our coders do this.  I believe they can also code septic shock if 
hypotension.

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 9:14 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] question

Hello group,

I am being told by our quality department that if a patient is documented with 
severe sepsis and has a lactic acid greater than 4 that it is automatically 
coded as septic shock even though it's not documented. Is this true?

Thanks,
Debbie Chambless
Sepsis Coordinator
Osceola Regional Medical Center
Kissimmee, Fl 34371
407-518-3949
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20170203/f3a87a42/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:18:31 -0500
From: "Belfi, Karen" <[email protected]>
To: "Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann, MSN, RN, CCRN, DC"
        <[email protected]>,    "PAMELA J. ANDERSON" <[email protected]>,
        hiqrimprove-poc-discuss
        <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] [EXTERNAL] Re: [**External**] Antibiotic
        order date & time
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

This is for infection criterion though, not antibiotic administration.
If an infection is mentioned in the antibiotic order (i.e. Levaquin for 
pneumonia) they're saying to use the order time for infection. Which makes 
sense since that's the time the physician is documenting an infection.

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann, MSN, RN, CCRN, DC
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 3:33 PM
To: PAMELA J. ANDERSON; hiqrimprove-poc-discuss; 
[email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sepsis Groups] [**External**] Antibiotic order date & 
time

OMGosh, it is always administration time.  If it is ordered and not given - not 
compliant

Thanks,

MARY ANN BARNES-DALY MS RN CCRN DC  | Clinical Performance Improvement 
Consultant Quality & Clinical Effectiveness Team | Office of Patient Experience 
Sutter Health -2200 River Plaza Drive, Sacramento, CA 95833 Mobile 
916.200.5604| [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, 
build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."   ~R. Buckminster 
Fuller

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of PAMELA J. ANDERSON
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:45 AM
To: hiqrimprove-poc-discuss <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: [**External**] [Sepsis Groups] Antibiotic order date & time


WARNING: This email originated outside of the Sutter Health email system!
DO NOT CLICK links if the sender is unknown and never provide your User ID or 
Password.



Below is an email chain from Quality Net related to a question I sent in 
regarding the use of an antibiotic order time & date to identify suspected 
infection. The original question is at the bottom of the email with the 
clarifications I requested as you then scroll up.  Not sure if anyone else was 
aware of this, but wanted to let everyone know what the final reply was and ask 
for any comments/thoughts on this.
Thanks!
Pam

Pamela Anderson, BSN, RN
Clinical Data Abstractor
Loyola University Health System
Center for Clinical Excellence
2160 S. First Avenue | Bldg 105-3908 | Maywood, IL 60153
(O) 708-216-5228 | (F) 708-216-7867 | (E) 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



 Discussion Thread

 Response Via Email (Noel Albritton)

01/17/2017 01:37 PM


If criteria B and C were met within 6 hours of the antibiotic order containing 
the infection, the time of the order would be used for criteria A.

If criteria B and C were not met within 6 hours of the order containing the 
infection, but the antibiotic was documented as administered within 6 hours of 
criteria B and C, the time of the antibiotic administration would be used for 
criteria A.



 Customer By Email (Pamela Anderson)

01/17/2017 01:30 PM

Just to be sure, then - would I use the time the cefepime was ORDERED or the 
ADMINISTRATION time to determine if all the criteria was met in the 6hr window?
Thanks, Noel-
Pam



 Subject

Antibiotic order time & date



 Discussion Thread

 Response Via Email (Noel Albritton)

01/17/2017 09:49 AM

"Infection" would need to be documented within 6 hours of criteria B and C to 
use for criteria A.

With the documentation "cefepime ordered for infection," documentation on a MAR 
of the administration of cefepime within 6 hours of criteria B and C would 
suffice criteria A.

Per the example in the data element:  Levaquin is documented in MAR for 
pneumonia and nursing documentation indicates a dose was given within 6 hours 
of criteria b and c, pharmacy note that patient is on vancomycin for pneumonia).

 Customer By Email (Pamela Anderson)

01/16/2017 11:15 AM

Thanks for the reply - and just to be sure, even though the word "infection" 
was documented outside the 6hr window, because it referenced the antibiotic 
that WAS ordered in the 6hr window, we CAN use it for the infection criteria 
with the SIRS x2 and organ dysfunction also present to support the presence of 
severe sepsis?
Thank you!
Pam

 Response Via Email (Noel Albritton)

01/16/2017 10:58 AM

Thanks for the input.

The documentation "cefepime started overnight for possible infection" could be 
used for criteria A with the inclusion of "infection."  At this time, 
documentation of the rational for starting an antibiotic that includes signs or 
symptoms of an infection would not be acceptable.  You certainly make a valid 
point, as the antibiotics administered for leukocytosis and tachycardia, etc. 
were likely for a suspected infection.  However, the measure is seeking 
documentation of the suspected infection to suffice criteria A.  This may be 
expanded in a future version of the manual as we are continuing discussions 
within the measure steward regarding these scenarios and the best way to 
address them in the manual.

 Customer By Email (Pamela Anderson)

01/13/2017 01:30 PM

Thank you for the quick reply.  I understand the issue if no clarification at 
all as to why an antibiotic was ordered, but often times there is specific 
reference as to why without actually documenting "infection" (or the acceptable 
terminology for "infection), an antibiotic was ordered.  For example, the daily 
progress note 11/2 at 11:00am documents "patient febrile with leukocytosis and 
tachycardia; started cefepime overnight"; or "patient febrile with leukocytosis 
& tachycardia; cefepime started overnight for possible infection" (ordered 11/1 
@ 20:00). I think that this is quite obvious that the antibiotic was not for 
prophylaxis but was started for coverage of a possible infection. With this 
kind of documentation, I would think that the antibiotic order date & time 
would be more accurate in identifying the time infection was suspected.
Just putting it out there!
Pam


 Response Via Email (Noel Albritton)

01/13/2017 01:09 PM

Hi Pamela,

Thanks for the question/input.

Since antibiotics may be ordered for reasons other than treatment of a specific 
infection (such as prophylactic antibiotics), the infection is required to be 
documented.  If an infection is documented in an antibiotic order, the time of 
the order could be used.  Otherwise, the specified time of documentation in a 
note or the note opened time would be used for infections documented in a 
physician's note.  The note opened time simply provides a consistent point to 
abstract.

Hope this helps!



 Customer By Web Form (Pamela Anderson)

01/12/2017 01:20 PM

Just wondering why can't the time and date an antibiotic was ordered (if no 
indication is present in the order) be used as time and date for 
possible/suspected infection? It appears to me that if a LIP is ordering an 
antibiotic, he/she is covering for a possible bacterial infection, even if the 
verbiage in the notes doesn't specifically say that. Also, for the sake of 
accurate identification of Severe sepsis time of presentation, wouldn't the 
order time be more specific than the note documentation that might be hours 
later? Just wanted to put it out there for thought- Thank you- Pam

Pamela Anderson, BSN, RN
Clinical Data Abstractor
Loyola University Health System
Center for Clinical Excellence
2160 S. First Avenue | Bldg 105-3915 | Maywood, IL 60153
(O) 708-216-5544 | (F) 708-216-7867 | (E) 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE**  This email communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential and privileged PHI for the use of the designated 
recipients named above.  Distribution, reproduction or any other use of this 
transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If 
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately.



 Question Reference #170112-000090

Product Level 1:

Measures & Data Element Abstraction

Category Level 1:

Hospital Inpatient - Sepsis

Category Level 2:

Severe Sepsis Presentation Date and Time

Date Created:

01/12/2017 01:20 PM

Last Updated:

01/17/2017 09:49 AM

Status:

Solved

Discharge Period:

01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017




Pamela Anderson, BSN, RN
Clinical Data Abstractor
Loyola University Health System
Center for Clinical Excellence
2160 S. First Avenue | Bldg 105-3908 | Maywood, IL 60153
(O) 708-216-5228 | (F) 708-216-7867 | (E) 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE**  This email communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential and privileged PHI for the use of the designated 
recipients named above.  Distribution, reproduction or any other use of this 
transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If 
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately.


Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Trinity Health and is 
intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain 
information that is privileged and confidential.  Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender regarding the 
error in a separate email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20170206/9a449b41/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


------------------------------

End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 233, Issue 2
********************************************

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to