Miklos Tirpak wrote:
> We just had a long discussion with Jan and Michal, and the result is that:
>
> - if (@rr.param.lr) will return false if the parameter exists, but has 
> empty body. So there will be no change, perl and pyton work the same way.
>   
This would be fine and in accord with how the AVPs work now.
> - a new function will be introduced that can be used to explicitly check 
> the existence of a header or parameter, something like if 
> (exists((@rr.param.lr)) than...
>
>   
Maybe a @rr.param.lr.exits or @rr.param.present.lr; I'd find something 
like this more natural than a "function".


Bogdan.
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
> On 04/14/2008 01:31 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
>   
>> Miklos Tirpak wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> there is an issue with error handling as well, the result of an 
>>> expression evaluation that causes error can be hardly determined, for 
>>> example:
>>>
>>> @rr.uri tries to parse the RR HF, and get the URI part of it, but it 
>>> returns an error if the RR HF is missing from the request, because the 
>>> parsing fails:
>>>
>>> if (@rr.uri) is false, which is correct.
>>>
>>> if ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is also false, which is strange. The error is 
>>> captured, 
>>> and eval_expr() exists before negating the result.
>>>
>>> if (@rr.uri || 1) is also false, because nothing after @rr.uri is checked.
>>>
>>> The problem exists with AVPs as well:
>>>
>>> $second = 2;
>>> if ($second != "foo") is false, which means 2=="foo". The reason is the 
>>> same as above, the string cannot be converted to integer, thus, the 
>>> evaluator returns error.
>>>
>>> None of the above expressions should result error in my opinion, they 
>>> could simply return true or false instead. What do you think?
>>>       
>>   Yes, I agree, I was my impression that is already worked that way, but
>>   probably not.
>>
>>     Jan.
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Serdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>
>   


-- 
Bogdan Pintea

iptego GmbH  -  VoIP Security
http://www.iptego.com

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev

Reply via email to