Great, looking forward to it.

Speaking of "<script>", since the patch is not yet applied, I'd sneak in 
a feat. req.: I've always though that it would be helpful to also have 
the route name (/number) in the log messages generated from script; now, 
I add it manually, but I guess that adding it automatically shouldn't be 
that difficult.


Bogdan.

Ondrej Martinek wrote:
> there's an example of the "stderr" log output:
> $ ser -ddDDEf test.cfg
>
> ==============
> SER compiled w/ -DNO_DEBUG:
>
> Listening on
>              udp: localhost [127.0.0.1]:5070
>  0(18127) BUG: <core>: get_sock_info_list: invalid proto 4
> Aliases:
>
>  0(18127) WARNING: <core>: tcp_options: tcp_connect_wait depends on 
> tcp_buf_write,  disabling...
>  0(18127) INFO: <core>: init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch 
> method (auto detected)
>  0(18127) BUG: <core>: core limits increased only to 4194304
>  0(18127) WARNING: xlog: xl_mod_init: DIFFERENT hostname 'ds2' and 
> gethostbyname 'ds2.sip-server.net'
>  0(18127) INFO: <core>: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 110592
>  0(18127) INFO: <core>: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
>  4(18131) INFO: <core>: signal 2 received
>  2(18129) INFO: <core>: signal 2 received
>  3(18130) INFO: <core>: signal 2 received
>  3(18130) INFO: <core>: signal 15 received
>  0(18127) NOTICE: <core>: Thank you for flying ser
>
> ==============
> SER compiled w/o -DNO_DEBUG:
>
> Listening on
>              udp: localhost [127.0.0.1]:5070
>  0(21524) BUG: <core> [socket_info.c:201]: get_sock_info_list: invalid 
> proto 4
> Aliases:
>
>  0(21524) WARNING: <core> [tcp_options.c:102]: tcp_options: 
> tcp_connect_wait depends on tcp_buf_write,  disabling...
>  0(21524) INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:3744]: init_tcp: using epoll_lt as 
> the io watch method (auto detected)
>  0(21524) BUG: <core> [daemonize.c:344]: core limits increased only to 
> 4194304
>  0(21524) WARNING: xlog [xl_lib.c:1691]: xl_mod_init: DIFFERENT 
> hostname 'ds2' and gethostbyname 'ds2.sip-server.net'
>  0(21524) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:166]: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is 
> initially 110592
>  0(21524) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:217]: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is 
> finally 262142
>  2(21526) BUG: <script>: Slow timer executed
>  3(21527) BUG: <script>: Fast timer executed
>  2(21526) BUG: <script>: Slow timer executed
>  3(21527) INFO: <core> [main.c:729]: signal 2 received
>  3(21527) INFO: <core> [main.c:729]: signal 15 received
>  1(21525) INFO: <core> [main.c:729]: signal 15 received
>  5(21529) INFO: <core> [main.c:729]: signal 15 received
>  0(21524) NOTICE: <core> [main.c:640]: Thank you for flying ser
>
> ==============
>
> Ondrej Martinek wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've already made some changes to the logging in SER.  The log 
>> messages will automatically include the severity,  the position 
>> (filename and line) and the module name (or "<core>"/"<script>" 
>> string).  Currently, it's being reviewed by Jan Janak.
>>
>> Moreover, I wrote a script that replaces LOG(static_severity, ...) by 
>> corresponding dedicated macros and removes the module name and the 
>> severity string from the log messages in SER sources.
>>
>> Regards
>> --ondra
>>
>> Bogdan Pintea wrote:
>>> I was actually wondering: shouldn't all logging be, finally, leveled?
>>>
>>> Right now, there are 3 logging types:
>>> - using dedicated macros for severity (ERR, WARN etc);
>>> - LOG(<severity>, ...), manually beautified -- severity and maybe 
>>> function name present (the case of current commit);
>>> - as previous, but either no severity or no location info, or both 
>>> missing;
>>>
>>> This is "hard" to deal with, both for a human and an automated log 
>>> parser (besides the unprofessional, chaotic looks :-) ) .
>>>
>>> Are there clear disadvantages against sticking to only logging with 
>>> dedicated severity macros and (progressively) migrate all log 
>>> statements to that model?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bogdan.
>>>
>>> PS. I know not all compilers in all their versions have location 
>>> helpers and that manual beautifying helps with those, but this 
>>> support should nowadays be marginally (if at all) needed; besides, 
>>> current status is mixed enough to be uncomfortable in those 
>>> situations, as well.
>>>
>>> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>>>> calrissian    2008/08/24 00:15:43 CEST
>>>>
>>>>   SER CVS Repository
>>>>
>>>>   Modified files:
>>>>     .                    forward.c   Log:
>>>>   fixed wrong function name in error message
>>>>     Revision  Changes    Path
>>>>   1.118     +2 -2      sip_router/forward.c
>>>> http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/forward.c.diff?r1=1.117&r2=1.118
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Serdev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serdev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev

-- 
Bogdan Pintea

iptego GmbH
http://www.iptego.com

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev

Reply via email to