Danny Angus wrote: > > Regarding the website & docs, > Any opinions on whether it would be a good or poor idea to > use Maven, does > anyone prefer forrest, should we stick with plain-old xsl ... > this is not a proposal or a vote, just a request for comments. > Please note this isn't a call for evangelisation, lets hear if the > commiters have an opinion. > Once I've gauged the mood I'll make a proposal. > > d.
<<IF>> we were to switch to Maven as our project wide build tool, as oppossed to vanilla Ant scripts, I might be swayed toward Maven. I would not like to see us using one build tool for the website and docs. and another for the source. This would just be confusing and cause extra work. Speaking of extra work, changing to another base document format would require that all of the existing documents be changed. In my view, we would need some very compelling advantages to undertake this work, and ideally a tool that performed the transformations for us. Regardless of format and tools, we do need to change the directory structure. I am not sure we need to do more right now. What problems do you envisage a change of tools or format solving? Cheers, -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
