I could work on Fast-fail, especially since I've worked on it in my company :-)
However, it seems a lot of ppl are already interested and quite capable. Would you rather me to focus on clustering or have several ppl proposes fast-fail? nicolas 2005/6/4, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have seen several projects listed on the Wiki. > > Those are some, feel free to propose others. > > I came up with another today, which is going through all of JAMES, finding > all of the text strings, replacing the in-line text with the use of > property > bundles that use placeholders for the values, thus permitting localization > of messages. > > We have no idea what Google will accept, mind you. > > > I would like to send a proposal to Google about SPF, fast-fail or > > clustering. Which one is the most important to you? > > Personally, I want to see fast-fail (I have written all of the fast-fail > code so far, want to see how it is done replaced, and have a pretty fair > idea of one way for that to be done), of which SPF would be a plug-in. > > > they ask for a list of deliverables: do you need > > any doc with the code? > > LOL We could use doc for the existing code, much less the new code. In > fact, if someone wanted to write real documentation for users and > developers, I feel that THAT would be a valid project. But, again, we have > no idea what Google will accept. > > --- Noel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
