> There are issues with this as well, since someip.dom/64 could > be a valid IPv6 network but when it resolves to both IPv4 and > IPv6 it's not alway simple to guess what was intended. And > /64 on an IPv4 address will create an open relay, so perhaps > it's a good idea to add a separete AuthorizedAddressesV6 > configuration? > (As a side note, is using DNS names in AuthorizedAddresses a > smart thing to do? I *might* be vunarable to DNS poisoning > and could cause problems when DNS entry's are changed.)
We should encourage authentication or SMIME signing usage. IMHO we can support IP only in AuthorizedAddresses. > One last question, do you want me to create (one or separate) > Jira issues for this? As you already done a good job identifying the needed steps you can add separate issues and tell us the dependecies (if any) between issues so that we can link them (please use Improvement/New feature as issue type, and 3.0 as fix version) Eventually add "Task" issues if you plan to investigate on best configurations/usage of ipv4/ipv6 for mail servers environments so you will have a place to add comments with the news. > Arjan Veenstra > (off the get some sleep now) Thank you, Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]