(my idea was a little different but I saw the first reaction and I changed
my mind).
But no commiter gave a -1 till yet. Why shouldn't we switch if it works for you?
Did anyone proved the contrary or had any founded with tests argument - except
FUD?
After that we could still investigate that 'space problem'.
You are waiting for minimum 3 + votes? But are there so many active comitters
on this list?
If yes, than make another thread, called [vote] and count only the arguments of
commiters.
IMHO the container is not part of our application (James) and james should
run fine in each container using the pros and cons of each container.
AFAIK this was planned for 3.0 with that POJO strategy :).
People
that need functional classloaders will need to use loom. People that need to
do hot deploy/undeploy of applications will use loom.
But will the users be able to switch to loom? I suspect not.
Wouldn't be better to switch officially for the coming alphas so that everybody
can test it?
Thanks in advance,
Ahmed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
