Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I had suggested JavaMail, but when we all did further looking, it was > observed that JavaMail is not efficient for server storage, > it would tie us > to JavaMail, and worse to MimeMessage. We really want a > store that deals > with streams, from which we can easily construct a > MimeMessage on demand, > but can also use MIME4J without the overhead --- and parsing > issues --- of > the MimeMessage class. > > If those are solvable within the context of using JavaMail > for server-side > storage, fine. Alternatively, if we have a data store that > works for us and > can be put underneath JavaMail when/if we want to use > JavaMail, that's fine, > too. > > Might we move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
Good idea! Sent this to server-dev. Will comment there. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
