On 4/20/06, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Serge Knystautas wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > I was going to commit this, but wanted to run it by you just since it > > introduces another dependency. > > Ugh! Surely this is an optional feature. If people want to use it only then > should they need to add the dependencies. > > If and when we move to OSGi, choosing to incorporate a feature will > automagically ensure that the dependencies are present. Until then an > optional mailet needs to be manually supplied with its dependents.
Does a 144k jar really warrant an "ugh"? Cocoon has 29.4m of optional jars that it bundles. If OSGi will dynamically download jars on demand, then sounds pretty cool. I don't know much about it. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
