On 4/21/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > Why don't we simply put the mailet in the Jar and import the package in > > config.xml ? > > > > A mailet already is a class that handle a mail and could be able to send > > the message to remote service. > > one has to write a new mailet for each remote service type. > if this mailet is integrated within the James code base you have to link > to the remote service interfaces at build time. this is fine but leads > to third-party-lib pollution.
It sounds like I'm the only one interested in bundling these third party libraries. So long as licensing issues are addressed, I don't see the downside to including jars that are used by optional mailets. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
