Venkataraman, Narendra wrote:
I agree with you on the implicit dependencies on state hash map.
While you work on A, I propose to implement some useful  message and
command handlers that we can ship with JAMES.
The experience in developing these handlers can provide inputs to long
term B approach.

Do you have any suggestions?

I thought that we could publish the list of handlers into the SMTPSession so we could configure messageHandlers in the main "chain" and leave the DataCmdHandler to cycle the configured handlers in seatch of "MessageHandler"s. This is not a "final solution" but would solve the problem of the "double configuration" and it is very easy.

I think that a first step would be to move the current ESMTP features to single handlers so that we won't have a 1:1 in SMTP commands => Handlers but better a 1:1 in SMTP features => Handlers.

Btw I think that we'll find the best way and probably some problem while working on it.

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to