Norman Maurer wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman:
> > Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > > I would like to also change the smtp command handler code
> > > before a final release, otherwise we will have to mantain
> > > 2 totally different fastfail codes.
> > I disagree. We document this as INTERNAL ONLY, we do NOT
> > encourage people to write new ones, and warn them that the
> > API will change, we get the product shipping, and THEN we
> > clean up the API. Unless there is something in the current
> > API that blocks OUR ability to ship a release.
> But a "better and more pluggable" smtp handler code whould be
> also a very nice think.
Yes it would. High on my list. I was going to start work on something in a
branch, and Stefano also has ideas, so I'd be happy for us to set off a
branch to collaborate on such changes. But if we don't adopt some
discipline on what changes we do, we will never get a release out. I was
hoping to do a release many months ago, but a flurry of changes to the core
wiped out all chance of that happening. Now, with a lot of work from Bernd
and Stefano (and backing out some changes), the core is starting to feel
stable again, and we can look forward to a release. But not if we keep
changing things.
> If we want to not any new featues or improvements yet we should
> write a new roadmap for next changes and whats the main goals.
I do not believe that we have too much, if any, disagreement amongst
ourselves on changes and goals (other than my dislike for Maven ;-)). I'm
just saying that we should consolidate a release first.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
