----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefano Bagnara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <server-dev@james.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: James 2.4 and repositories...
I don't consider myself a new coder on James, but I think that merging 2
interfaces that are currently used to store and retrieve the same
identical object in the same identical persistent area is a good thing.
If I proposed it is because I think it is really of benefit: I don't take
James as a sandbox for proof programming ;-)
IMAP is not another story: I started with this SIMPLE proposal because I
was thinking at what we need for IMAP. The first thing is a
MessageRepository supporting IMAP: I don't want to bring "old" things in
this new MessageRepository so we should first clean up the current things.
We currently store Mail objects where we should only store MimeMessages:
I'm trying to fix this.
If you think it's better to keep the 2 interfaces please tell me your
motivations.
Stefano
My motivation is that if I want to add or change something in the future it
is easier for me if I don't have to catch up big changes resulting from many
different changes like refactoring or splitting on method into 2 and so on.
Markus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
