----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefano Bagnara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <server-dev@james.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: James 2.4 and repositories...
Markus Kühn wrote:
My motivation is that if I want to add or change something in the future
it is easier for me if I don't have to catch up big changes resulting
from many different changes like refactoring or splitting on method into
2 and so on.
Refactoring is the heart of programming. If you don't need new things you
can use the old one.
If we don't change anything we can't move on.
Sure.
We just branched 2.3 so we can even feel more free to change things in
trunk.
Btw you probably don't understand my proposal, because my intended goal
was to keep it simple for people like you that have locally branched from
James 2.[012] to upgrade to a future 3.0.
So, maybe I misunderstood. You seem to already take this aspect into
consideration and also agree that it is not always worth making things just
more readable.
Markus
I
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
