I use james at work and it is a very good way of controlling project
structure, (src, docs, tests, everything), I would be +1 to maven if a
POC demonstrated that it meets all of our requirements.

d.

On 25/05/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+0.  I use ant for everything still.  The one thing I see Maven as
able to do better is generate a site layout better... which is
appealing since our website generation is pretty influx/messed up now,
and we do have lots of subprojects that could use their own mini site
in a consistent layout.

Not sure it really helps us with versioning docs generation, but
anyway, those are my 2 cents.

--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to