I use james at work and it is a very good way of controlling project structure, (src, docs, tests, everything), I would be +1 to maven if a POC demonstrated that it meets all of our requirements.
d. On 25/05/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+0. I use ant for everything still. The one thing I see Maven as able to do better is generate a site layout better... which is appealing since our website generation is pretty influx/messed up now, and we do have lots of subprojects that could use their own mini site in a consistent layout. Not sure it really helps us with versioning docs generation, but anyway, those are my 2 cents. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]