Am Donnerstag, den 25.05.2006, 18:47 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > Norman commented: > > > a modular virtual hosting support whould be a really nice thing. > > The current way the virtual user table support is not the best. > > In what way? Actually, I would say that the current virtual user table code > is in pretty good shape, and is very powerful. The major thing that I would > do is factor out the virtual user table code to make it a service that can > be used by other components in the system. That way we can check to see if > I particular user would have a valid mapping, and if the mapping would be > local. > > That requires a bit of thought, rather than rushing into coding, because we > can configure multiple virtual user tables, implying that any client of the > service would need to make sure that the desired mapping was being applied. > > --- Noel
This exactly why i start this issue. I want to hear other thoughts etc. Maybe its just me who not like the current handling ;-) bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
