I've noticed we have/are rapidly added/ing many "subprojects" to James. The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache, so wanted to a) have group discuss how they see these as related and b) be intentional in the term we're using.
1. How these code bases are related My 2 cents... these are code bases with separate code bases, separate (but hopefully similar) build processes, separate (but visually similar) websites. For me, the most important issue is that we have only one committer base across all these. i.e., we're not going to add someone exclusively to mime4j or postage. 2. Intentional with terms we're using Here are some sample terms... subproject - jakarta terminology project - xml.apache.org's terminology plugin - maven.apache.org's terminology module - ? codebase - ? Others? What do you think? -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
