Hi guys, Am Sonntag, den 23.07.2006, 00:13 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > I don't agree with Vincenzo about what is a bug and what could introduce > problems, btw this is a matter of personal views, so here is my vote: > For me its not a bug anyway... its a improvment
> -1 to reroll rc1: we already have the tag and an in-progress vote/test > (i did this once, we already agreed this was a mistake, so try to not > repeat this). > > -0 to apply the patch for the next rc: i think we could live we a debug > logged as info in experimental code (disabled by default) Like i said i have ni problems with that.. but not so importent for me.. i can life even without the patch.. > > So I'm not vetoing it, but I'll change it to +1 if we'll find much more > bugs in RC1 and we'll have a longer release cycle for the next rc/tests. > I don't hope so .. > Imho it does not make sense to create a new release for a log change and > delay even if few days our rc1 release, but I'm not the one that prepare > releases and I can't know if this will really delay things. > Yes true... we should release rc1 without that change and put it maybe in the next rc or the final.. Let us see.. > Stefano > > Norman Maurer wrote: > > I also see no problems to this in rc1.. i can reroll the release or put > > it in rc2 .. > > +1 for rc2 > > +0 rc1 > > > > bye > > Norman > > > > Am Samstag, den 22.07.2006, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Vincenzo Gianferrari > > Pini: > >> I disagree. It was a bug, though trivial. And one year ago the behaviour > >> was like now after the fix (at least at info log level). > >> > >> And if we find a bug, even not critical, whose fix is trivial, it can > >> and should be applied even to RC. > >> > >> I would otherwise yesterday have voted -1 to "[VOTE] James 2.3.0rc1 > >> Release", as it's been two weeks that I said that I was going to test > >> this weekend in my production system. > >> > >> And JAMES-515 is not a fix to a bug, simply a cleanup that could > >> introduce problems to existing customers, and no perceived functional > >> advantage. > >> > >> Vincenzo bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
