Hi Noel,

Noel J. Bergman schrieb:

And another Handler, which allows common Bendings of the RFC.

Can you elaborate?  Would this be the handler with switches to do things like 
fix bogus addresses that lack brackets?


yes, this would be the handler that accepts those common violations to the RFC. Starting with the missing brackets. Others will probably follow. We ourselves have problems that some Backup Reporting bla program sends malformed messages, which passed through qmail nicely but are rejected by james. Norman has more information on why the Mail is rejected.

Another question I have is, why are you against an example inside the configuration file, which is commented out by default?

I as a Systems Administrator always like well documented Configuration Files over Well Documentation. Although good Documentation is a MUST, I learn how to use the software by reading the config file first.

But in the End I have nothing against leaving the configuration comment out of the config file. I was just curious.

Kind regards

Juergen Hoffmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to