Danny Angus ha scritto: >> I prefer to >> not require a full J2EE stack for running it. If we build upon JCR and >> JMS we already provide lots of options for deployment. Btw it seems you >> switch deployment options too fast ;-) .. yesterday (some months ago) >> everyone was for OSGi... I don't read OSGi in this mail... > > I don't think we should *require* J2EE, but the point I made to Noel > is that there are benefits in some circumstances, of making an MDB > deployment of the spoolmanager an attractive *option*. > > OSGi is still a possibility. The thing we should be focussed on is > changing James so that it could be deployed as easily in any of many > different environments, and pick *one* for our core distribution. > > d.
+1 Rephrased this way I agree ;-) [ Noel has a special ability to make things looks bad to me :-P ] Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
