On 5/3/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Søren Hilmer wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2007 11:40, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> On 5/3/07, Søren Hilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Also I might be wrong, but as we talk directly to the network, the >>> authorized way to integrate into an EJB container is through a JCA >>> adapter, and they are kind of beastly to implement :-) >> >> Unfortunately, you aren't wrong :-) > > No, actually I did not believe I was :-) They can definitely get a little convoluted, but you wouldn't need to support transacted delivery, security or outbound connections which does cut the problem space down considerably. It'd definitely be a doable task. If you were to try it I'd recommend liberally swiping ActiveMQ's Resoure Adapter code and just start tearing out bits and reworking it for James. I'm sure they have unit tests for it and everything. It's actually something I've hoped would happen. I know at some apachecon a couple years ago I cornered some poor JAMES developer and bored him for a good 45 minutes on the benefits of having a JAMES JCA adapter so people could write MDBs that consumed email. Ok... so maybe I did that more than once :)
there are some interesting possibilities in this area both inbound and outbound - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
