On 6/4/08, Ihsiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello

Hi

>   I am part of a team that works on integrating James with webbased
> mailing solution. So far, we have sucessfully developed integration for
> smtp and pop3, and now we are going to work on IMAP. I know that current
> IMAP is not production ready - yet, so we want to work closely with you
> and make it better (for you) and usefull (for us). If we get permission,
> therewill be probably 2 persons available for about 2-3 months for that
> project. But before we get to that I need to know what's current stare
> of IMAP code, and what areas requies work. Can anyone describe it to me?

There are currently two IMAP implementations on trunk. One has a
straightforward design and is currently unmaintained. The second is an
experimental rewrite. This code is under active development but is
difficult to work with (my interest is in advanced high performance
mail architectures and it's an in-place rewrite since I use it for my
mail).

The main implementation is incomplete, buggy and leaks memory. The new
implementation works ok with the clients I use and is very close to
being feature complete. But the original should be fixable by
cross-porting.
Which version interests you?

Robert

>
> thx
>
> --
> regards
> Bartosz Tomasik

> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to