Am Sonntag, den 15.06.2008, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >> > >> anything else that needs to be done before 0.2 can be released? > >> > >> - robert > > > > I think the only "open" issue is "Why don't we include javacc, javamail and > > activation jars in the source tree/distribution so to be able to build it > > offline without any manual download?" by Norman in the recent "Two builds" > > thread. I second him. > > i'd be glad to fix this in a subsequent release but ATM AIUI we can't > distribute: we'd need to wait until the third party license stuff is > agreed (or until the next JavaCC release). if the community is > unwilling to support new releases until a consensus is reached then > i'll back off pushing this sequence of releases forward.
What third party license stuff you talking about ? Can you elleborate ? > > The problem with the stage folder is the usual m2/website/pom issue to > > create problems to people using maven to build the website (by creating bad > > poms in their local repository) but this is already true for commons-logging > > and log4j that we have there, so adding javamail/javacc/activation won't > > break anything) > > > > My other concern (very minor) is the folder for the bnd tool: I would prefer > > "biz.aQute" instead of "aQute" because this is the groupId they use to > > publish stuff in m2 repositories. But this can be safely ignored. > > i wasn't aware of that: please jump in and fix (if i don't get there before > you) > > - robert +1 Thx Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
