On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.06.2008, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: >> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> >> >> anything else that needs to be done before 0.2 can be released? >> >> >> >> - robert >> > >> > I think the only "open" issue is "Why don't we include javacc, javamail and >> > activation jars in the source tree/distribution so to be able to build it >> > offline without any manual download?" by Norman in the recent "Two builds" >> > thread. I second him. >> >> i'd be glad to fix this in a subsequent release but ATM AIUI we can't >> distribute: we'd need to wait until the third party license stuff is >> agreed (or until the next JavaCC release). if the community is >> unwilling to support new releases until a consensus is reached then >> i'll back off pushing this sequence of releases forward. > > What third party license stuff you talking about ? Can you elleborate ?
1. apache has yet to agree it's third party licensing policy 2. javacc has changed it's license to BSD but is yet to cut a full release under the new license - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
