On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> i think that the time's right to convert mime4j into a project with >> multiple modules with examples, benchmarks and main as the initial >> modules. >> >> opinions? > > i think there's a consensus that this is a good idea > > but i think that it would be better to focus on resolving the issues > remaining for 0.6 and switch after the release
Should we open a JIRA for 0.7? I would like to do one thing in 0.6 in preparation for multiple modules: the Storage classes reside in package o.a.j.mime4j.message.storage. But I think that nothing inherently links a Storage object to a Mime4J message (or Mime4J for that matter). So I'd like to change the package to o.a.j.mime4j.storage or maybe even o.a.james.storage, I'm not such which one is better. The idea is that the storage stuff should eventually end up in a its own sub-module. Markus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
