On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Markus Wiederkehr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> i think that the time's right to convert mime4j into a project with >>> multiple modules with examples, benchmarks and main as the initial >>> modules. >>> >>> opinions? >> >> i think there's a consensus that this is a good idea >> >> but i think that it would be better to focus on resolving the issues >> remaining for 0.6 and switch after the release > > Should we open a JIRA for 0.7?
+1 > I would like to do one thing in 0.6 in preparation for multiple > modules: the Storage classes reside in package > o.a.j.mime4j.message.storage. But I think that nothing inherently > links a Storage object to a Mime4J message (or Mime4J for that > matter). ok > So I'd like to change the package to o.a.j.mime4j.storage or maybe > even o.a.james.storage, I'm not such which one is better. o.a.j.mime4j.storage (for the moment) > The idea is that the storage stuff should eventually end up in a its > own sub-module. +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
