Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build
> now works but some more work is needed on the content.
> 
> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from
> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is
> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)'
> 
> opinions?

We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the
"Server" menu:
---------
2.3.1
2.3.0
2.2.0
3.0-dev
---------

And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable".

-b-




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to