On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build >> now works but some more work is needed on the content. >> >> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from >> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is >> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)' >> >> opinions? > > We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the > "Server" menu: > --------- > 2.3.1 > 2.3.0 > 2.2.0 > 3.0-dev > --------- > > And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable".
in the end, i went for 'Development 3.0' since it seemed to read a little easier (see http://james.apache.org/server/) i used http://james.apache.org/server/head/index.html for the subsite (since there were a number of places where 'head' was already used) i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and external products i wonder whether http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow opinions and feedback welcomed :-) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
