On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Stefano Bagnara<apa...@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara<apa...@bago.org> wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:

<snip>

>>> In order to have a correct NOTICE/LICENSE (with no superflous stuff in
>>> it) for each package most time means having 1 for the binary, 1 for the
>>> source distro, 1 for the remaining artifacts. I don't think it is worthy
>>> for anyone to have to mantain such a PITA.
>>
>> maven is now quite close to automatically producing satisfactory releases now
>
> At that time maven resource bundle was creating at least a NOTICE
> including a reference to all the LICENSES (I wasn't able to convince
> them that the licenses should have been listed in LICENSE) but then they
> stripped everything to simply use a simple NOTICE/LICENSE
>  with no additional data from included third party works.
>
> I stopped following the enhancement since then, but I'm interested in
> seeing how "quite close" is what you are describing: do you suggest that
> we should stop releasing until maven will do it "fully close"?

definitely not

i think the releases we've been producing are good enough or i would
have voted -1

BTW i'm not delaying my vote on this issue, it's just that i need to
finish writing a crawler for RAT (norman's using a repository so i
need to access using HTTP)

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to