On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Stefano Bagnara<apa...@bago.org> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara<apa...@bago.org> wrote: >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip> >>> In order to have a correct NOTICE/LICENSE (with no superflous stuff in >>> it) for each package most time means having 1 for the binary, 1 for the >>> source distro, 1 for the remaining artifacts. I don't think it is worthy >>> for anyone to have to mantain such a PITA. >> >> maven is now quite close to automatically producing satisfactory releases now > > At that time maven resource bundle was creating at least a NOTICE > including a reference to all the LICENSES (I wasn't able to convince > them that the licenses should have been listed in LICENSE) but then they > stripped everything to simply use a simple NOTICE/LICENSE > with no additional data from included third party works. > > I stopped following the enhancement since then, but I'm interested in > seeing how "quite close" is what you are describing: do you suggest that > we should stop releasing until maven will do it "fully close"? definitely not i think the releases we've been producing are good enough or i would have voted -1 BTW i'm not delaying my vote on this issue, it's just that i need to finish writing a crawler for RAT (norman's using a repository so i need to access using HTTP) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
