2010/10/26 Eric Charles <e...@apache.org>:
> I would like to propose a new menu
>    Sever 3.0
>    Server 2.3.2
>    Archive
>
> ... and move the Server 2.3.1, 2.3.0, 2.2.0 to the Archive page.
>
> The 2.3.2 would need to get regenerated and republished.

+1, maybe "Server v3" and "Server v2" are more general for a menu name
that we have in every page, otherwise at every subrelease we have to
recreate the whole site, but take this only as an hint (you seems to
understand the implication so I'm fine your choices).

> If ok with this, there is 3 actions:
> - Republish 2.3.2: I tried to build the site, but it fails to download the
> needed dependency. I will retry from another internet connection.

ok. Maybe 2.3 needs maven 2 because maven 3 deprecated/removed some
stuff we used in 2.3 (local repository in the stage module and the
legacy repository style).

> - In the index pages, push users to download and try 3.0-M1 rather than the
> stable 2.3.2.

I would prefer to keep pushing users to 2.3.2 for a while. 3.0-M1 is
still too new to push it to everyday users. 2.3.2 instead is proven
stable. So, let's start linking 3.0 for early adopters and testers,
but don't "push" it too much before the GA release.

> - Automatically update the nightly dir. if needed, cause we already have two
> places to download the snapshots; hudson and maven snaphot repo.

+1

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to