Ok then go ahead.... I just want to get the beta out soon enough

Bye
Norman
2011/6/30, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Am 30.06.2011 14:27, schrieb Eric Charles:
>>>
>>> On 30/06/11 14:19, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>> The main issues for me are a slow development cycle caused by
>>>>> unnecessary integration and targeting a moving target. IMO eliminating
>>>>> this bottleneck will save more time than the cost of cutting the
>>>>> additional release. Once we have a smooth pipeline, if this call turns
>>>>> out to be wrong, we can just move the assembly back in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not 100 % conviced.. Why not just freeze trunk for a few days
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or at least freeze pom's dependencies/plugins declarations.
>>
>> Yeah should be good enough..
>
> In general, freezing is just working around a needless bottleneck in
> our release pipeline. The best approach is to fix the bottleneck by
> lengthening the pipe. Taking the application assembly out creates two
> project that will be easy to release from one that's proving
> difficult.
>
> In particular, manual auditing takes me quite a while. If I were fully
> recovered, this might not be such an issue but ATM my productivity is
> very sensitive. Freezing would allow me to audit and create
> appropriate manual legal stuff but this would need to be repeated
> before each release and again when checking the release. At my current
> capacity level, I think this is likely to be a significant drain on my
> resources and slow everyone else down.
>
> Pushing assembly downstream from the server would allow me to check
> and release the assembled application. I'm pretty sure that we'll get
> better throughput this way but if it's not working for us, it would be
> easy enough to move the assembly back as a module of server.
>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to