On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:29, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > I still think that we should better have a source package to be voted > and this vote didn't include a source package
Well, there are a number of source packages to be voted on if you follow the link in Norman's vote post, although not a single package containing all the code. I'd agree if you'd say it would be awkward to review every single one of them. However, as you point out, reviewing binary artifacts is not sufficient to vet a release. My interpretation is that technically this vote is about the james/server/trunk code at rev 1145273, as is currently contained in (and per convention this will never change) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/james-server-3.0-beta2/ Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
